Today, our unity is a military strategy, where everyone works at the very limit of their effectiveness, at the edge of their capabilities, to defend our statehood and preserve Ukrainian identity.
Unity has saved us — that is a fact. We are a people who have given a clear answer: to be. We responded by coming together in an unprecedented way at the start of the invasion. Our horizontal ties became life-saving routes; our solidarity gave rise to a powerful volunteer movement that astonished the world.
We became people who had been given a new kind of strength. Unity was no illusion when families from the east arrived at our volunteer centre in Volochysk in house slippers, without belongings or warm clothes, and local residents took them into their homes. A few days later they would return and stay with us to volunteer for others.
I saw queues to give blood and queues to give money, queues to join the army and queues to enrol in territorial defence volunteer units.
That unity was tangible; it was felt both by those who needed help and by those who offered it selflessly. We all made the decision to resist. Society switched into survival mode.
In the fourth year of this exhausting full-scale war, we need to recalibrate those settings. We are under pressure from the Russian army along the line of contact and we live with the pain of daily losses.
The crushing exhaustion in the army and the shortage of people in our units have already led to critical fractures running through Ukrainian society. They are eroding our unity — when a civilian turns on a service member deep in the rear of the very state that soldier has been defending.
When the consequences of corruption scandals are not only financial losses and damage to democratic processes, but also total mistrust and public disillusionment. And it is hardest of all for those in uniform, because double standards and injustice devalue their service.
The worst thing that can happen to us is to buckle under internal pressure, to set swinging the pendulum of mistrust and mutual accusations. Without an honest conversation with one another, without dialogue between the authorities and citizens, and in the absence of unity, we once again risk Ukrainian statehood.
We have been here before. That is why, in our unit, we study history — so that soldiers can analyse the causes of the Russian–Ukrainian war, understand the value of the state and why we take responsibility for it. To realise that Russia will never reconcile itself to the existence of a sovereign Ukraine, and that this war, in one form or another, will continue — and no ceasefire is capable of becoming true peace.
So, we do not have many options: we must unite in the fight for our own state.